An Indigenous Author’s Response to the Savannah River Crossing Project

(“City Hall Landing, Savannah Belles Ferry” photograph by Aberjhani ©2024)

The planned Savannah Bridge Project, officially known as the Savannah River Crossing Project, has ignited significant public discourse, largely due to the complex interplay of economic, historical, and sociopolitical factors it embodies. Among the voices contributing to this dialogue is Aberjhani, a well-known author, poet, artist, and documentarian who is also a native of Savannah, Georgia (USA). His response to the proposed plans was submitted on the project’s ABridgeTooFarSAV.org website as the period for submitting comments was coming to a close on June 5, 2024.

The author’s input was further complicated by the fact that he had already composed a detailed 300-word statement before learning, during the submission process, that comments were limited to a specific number of characters that came to less than half of his response. Despite the character restrictions on the public comment portal, it is worth noting the polymath’s statement not only addresses the technical and logistical aspects of the project but also delves deeply into the historical and sociocultural implications of replacing the Eugene Talmadge Memorial Bridge.

This essay with objective ChatGPT input examines the implications of Aberjhani’s response, evaluates the validity or invalidity of his assertions, and discusses the broader political, sociological, historical, and philosophical issues associated with the Savannah River Crossing Project and the requests for public input on the same. To begin, the following is his response in full, which reportedly had to be submitted in two shortened sections.

ABERJHANI’S OFFICIAL RESPONSE TO SAVANNAH RIVER CROSSING PROJECT

Opportunities for Savannah-area residents to closely weigh the full implications of proposed plans to replace the “Talmadge Bridge” have been minimal and the Georgia Department of Transportation’s  (GDOT) insistence on moving “forward” with limited options can hardly be described as mindful of citizens’ preferences regarding the matter. Unfortunately, in truth, and tragically, many Savannahians no longer bother to comment on anything involving the “Talmadge Bridge” because something as simple as repeated requests to change the bridge’s name from one which celebrates white supremacy has been ignored for decades.

A primary reason given for the planned “Savannah River Crossing Project” is that the current bridge is hurting Savannah’s economy because it cannot accommodate the passage of newer-generation cargo ships to access specific port terminals located upriver. We are told this while also hearing in media reports that our region is “booming” economically and population-wise. Perhaps both statements are true.

In any event, it seems the governmental powers that be have decided the old/current bridge must go and either a new bridge (in a different location?) with a higher elevation, or a new tunnel running underneath the Savannah River, will take its place. Something so monumental is worth at least a comprehensive printed pamphlet or booklet placed in mailboxes for people to discuss and share in order to form informed opinions about it. What would such a change look like? Would the impact be similar to what Black communities on the city’s west side suffered when Savannah’s grand Union Station was torn down to make way for I-16 and decimated the once-thriving Black business district on West Broad Street (now MLK Blvd)?

As much as we seem to advance when it comes to matters of digital technology and engineering, certain segments of Georgia still seem trapped in plantation-like forms of behavior and decision-making from two centuries past. That also needs to be replaced.

By Aberjhani

Economic and Logistical Considerations

The above response raises critical points that warrant serious considerations. The author begins by acknowledging the economic motivations behind the project. The current bridge's inability to accommodate newer-generation cargo ships is cited as a primary reason for its replacement. This limitation, it is argued, hampers the economic growth of the region by restricting access to certain port terminals. This concern aligns with broader trends in global shipping and logistics, where ports are increasingly pressured to adapt to larger vessels to remain competitive.

However, Aberjhani juxtaposes this rationale with reports of Savannah's booming economy and population growth, suggesting a potential contradiction or, at the very least, a more nuanced economic picture than the one presented by proponents of the project. His call for a comprehensive printed pamphlet or booklet reflects a demand for greater transparency and public engagement, ensuring that citizens can form informed opinions based on a thorough understanding of the project's implications.

Historical and Sociocultural Context

The historical context of the Eugene Talmadge Memorial Bridge's name is a critical aspect of Aberjhani's argument. The issue is one he has addressed in books like Dreams of the Immortal City Savannah, as well as in the media and various visual art series. Named after a former Georgia governor known for his staunch white supremacist views, the bridge's name has long been a point of contention. Aberjhani highlights the repeated, yet ignored, requests to change the bridge's name as indicative of broader systemic issues within the region. This neglect underscores a persistent legacy of racial insensitivity and historical amnesia that continues to affect community relations.

In addition, the author’s reference to the destruction of Savannah's once grand Union Train Station, in the early 1960s, to make way for I-16, further illustrates the historical wounds inflicted on Black communities by past infrastructure projects. The demolition of the station led to the decimation of a once-thriving Black business district on West Broad Street, now Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. This historical precedent raises valid concerns about the potential impact of the proposed new bridge or tunnel on local communities, particularly those already marginalized.

Political and Sociological Dimensions

Politically, Aberjhani's response touches on the perceived disconnect between governmental decision-making processes and the preferences of local citizens. He critiques the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) for moving forward with limited options and insufficient public consultation. This critique reflects broader frustrations with how large-scale infrastructure projects are often decided and implemented without adequately considering the voices of those most affected.

Sociologically, the response highlights a sense of disenfranchisement among Savannah residents, particularly within Black communities. The comparison to plantation-like forms of behavior and decision-making suggests that despite advancements in technology and engineering, certain power dynamics remain unchanged. This perpetuation of exclusionary practices contributes to ongoing distrust and disengagement among residents, who feel their input is neither valued nor genuinely considered.

Philosophical Implications

Philosophically, Aberjhani raises questions about the values that underpin public infrastructure projects. The decision to replace the bridge should not solely be evaluated on economic and logistical grounds but also on its alignment with principles of justice, equity, and historical accountability. Aberjhani's call for a printed pamphlet or booklet emphasizes the need for an inclusive and deliberative democratic process, where all stakeholders have access to relevant information and the opportunity to participate meaningfully in decision-making.

The Black indigenous writer's response to the Savannah River Crossing Project encapsulates a multifaceted critique that extends beyond the immediate technical and economic considerations. His concerns about historical insensitivity, socio-economic disenfranchisement, and the need for greater public engagement reflect broader issues that should be central to the project's evaluation. The significance of his response lies in its ability to foreground the lived experiences and historical memories of Savannah's residents, challenging the simplistic narratives that often accompany large-scale infrastructure projects.

Conclusion

To the extent that the author-artist’s input should be taken into account, it represents a crucial perspective that bridges the gap between past injustices and present aspirations for a more inclusive and equitable future. Addressing the valid points raised, such as the need for greater transparency, historical sensitivity, and public participation, can lead to a more holistic approach to the Savannah River Crossing Project.

Incorporating the detailed and thoughtful response into the decision-making process would not only honor the principles of democracy and public participation but also help ensure that the project is carried out in a way that respects and benefits all residents of Savannah. As the city moves forward with this significant infrastructural change, it must strive to do so with an inclusive and conscientious approach that acknowledges its past while building a more equitable future. This approach would not only enhance the project's legitimacy but also foster a sense of ownership and trust among the diverse communities it aims to serve.
 
By ChatGPT Special Feature Contributor 5575
Special to AI Literary Chat Salon 2024

Step inside the AI Literary Chat Salon

A Deeper Dive into the River of Winged Dreams
Cultural Consciousness in Aime Cesaire’s Return to My Native Land and Aberjhani’s Return to Savannah
Introducing the AI Literary Chat Salon
Chatbot Op-ed 222: The Significance of ‘Songs from the Black Skylark zPed Music Player’ in the Face of Contemporary Challenges
These Black and Blue Red Zone Days in the Post-Pandemic Era
War-time Powers and Persuasions of Poetry
Inside the AI Literary Chat Salon: Literary Luminary Rosemary Daniell 
AI Flips the Interview Script with 7 Questions for 1 Author
AI Flips the Interview Script with 5 More Questions for 1 Author
Observing 20th Anniversary of Encyclopedia of the Harlem Renaissance
Chat Op-ed 444: Celebrating ‘The Wisdom of W.E.B. Du Bois’: A Testament to Enduring Relevance 
Stanley J. White as Viewed through a Lens of Creative Evolution
How 3 Poems Help Illuminate the Presidential Legacy of Barack H. Obama
‘Haiku-Elegy for a Queen’: Exploring 1 Poem’s Potential Value in 3 Contexts