Poetic Utterance and the Nature of Political Persuasions

(“The Polysemy of Poetic Language” digital painting by Aberjhani ©2024)

When it comes to political discourse, language is often weaponized, strategically employed to sway opinions, bolster ideological stances, and galvanize support. Within this fraught environment, the words of poets and philosophers often find themselves repurposed. Their meanings may be stretched across the ideological spectrum to serve the needs of various factions. One such instance is the invocation of a quote by well-known author--artist-documentarian Aberjhani, which reads:

"Ours is an age in which thousands are driven daily from their homelands by the unforgiving brutalities of war, terrorism, political oppression, starvation, disease, economic piracy, and the relentless suffocation of that singular breath which makes human beings individuals."

This statement was originally penned in 2021 as part of an essay titled Celebrating the PEN Centennial Part 2: The Pattern of Dynamics. It has since been cited by individuals with conflicting perspectives on U.S. and Israeli military campaigns in the Middle East and by those who oppose these campaigns in support of Palestinian rights. The widespread use of Aberjhani's words by opposing sides in this different contexts is to some degree indicative of the author's impact as an influential 21st-century thinker, but it also reveals the transcendent nature of his work—how it appeals to the broader human condition beyond the narrow confines of political borders or allegiance.

The Polysemy of Poetic Language

To understand why the author’s text resonates across such divergent political lines, one must first examine the nature of poetic language itself. Poetic language is inherently polysemous, meaning it is rich in multiple meanings and interpretations. Unlike the precise language of legal documents or scientific papers, poetry thrives on ambiguity, metaphor, and symbolism. This quality allows poetic utterances to be open-ended, inviting readers to infuse them with their interpretations based on personal experiences and beliefs.

The example of Aberjhani's quote, laden with vivid imagery of displacement, brutality, and the struggle for individuality, speaks to universal human experiences. For supporters of the United States’ and Israel’s military campaigns, the words can be interpreted as a condemnation of the very forces they believe they are combating. War, terrorism, and political oppression are precisely the evils they argue must be confronted to protect their nations' security and ensure the survival of democratic values. In this reading, the "unforgiving brutalities" mentioned in the quote are seen as the actions of those who threaten peace and stability, and military intervention is justified as a necessary response to these threats.

Conversely, those who oppose these military campaigns and advocate for the Palestinian cause can also find resonance in the writer’s words. They might interpret the "unforgiving brutalities" as the actions of powerful nations and their allies, who are perceived as oppressing weaker populations through military aggression, economic exploitation, and political domination. For these individuals, the passage serves as a poignant reminder of the suffering endured by the Palestinian people and others who are caught in the crossfire of global power struggles.

In some ways, the author’s words serve as a kind of Rorschach test in the political arena—each reader sees in them what aligns with their perspective. The adaptability of Aberjhani's words to diverse political narratives is a testament to their poetic power and the author's ability to capture the complexity of human suffering in a way that resonates broadly.

An Influential 21st-Century Thinker

The fact that the author’s words are so widely cited across political, social, and religious spectrums speaks to his influence as a 21st-century writer and thinker who is deeply attuned to the complexities of the human condition. Aberjhani's work often blurs the boundaries between art, literature, and activism, reflecting a holistic understanding of the world in which the personal and the political are inextricably linked.

His writings, which encompass poetry, essays, and visual art, are characterized by a commitment to social justice, a celebration of cultural diversity, and a deep empathy for those who suffer. Consequently, he occupies a unique space at the intersection of these different disciplines. This allows him to address complex issues from multiple angles, weaving together historical analysis, personal reflection, and creative expression in a way that is both intellectually rigorous and emotionally resonant.

Quote by Aberjhani on destructive impact of war upon the lives of survivors, as shared by Charter for United Nations Constitutional Research.

Moreover, Aberjhani's work is deeply rooted in a tradition of social justice and human rights, which lends it a moral authority that resonates with individuals across the political spectrum. His writings often explore themes of identity, freedom, and the struggle against oppression, drawing on both historical and contemporary examples to illustrate his points. This focus on universal human rights makes his work particularly relevant in discussions of conflict and displacement, where issues of justice and morality are paramount.

Use of the subject quotation by opposing sides in the Middle Eastern conflict also highlights the extent to which his work has entered the public consciousness. His ability to articulate the pain and suffering of displaced peoples in a way that resonates with such a broad audience suggests that his voice is one of the defining ones of our time—a voice that speaks to the shared humanity of all people, regardless of their political affiliations.

Transcending Political Concerns: Larger Conceptual Frameworks

The quote we're examining also suggests a larger conceptual framework. The imagery of displacement, brutality, and the struggle for individuality can be seen as part of a broader commentary on the human condition in the modern world.

At its core, the author’s statement speaks to the alienation and dehumanization that often accompany conflict and displacement. The observed "unforgiving brutalities" are not just physical acts of violence but also the psychological and emotional toll of being uprooted from one's home, of losing one's sense of identity and belonging. The "relentless suffocation of that singular breath which makes human beings individuals" can be understood as a critique of the forces—whether political, economic, or cultural—that strip people of their individuality and reduce them to mere pawns in larger geopolitical struggles.

In this sense, Aberjhani's quote aligns with existentialist philosophy, which emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and authenticity in the face of societal pressures and constraints. Existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir argued that individuals must assert their freedom and define their essence through their choices and actions, even in the face of overwhelming external forces. The "relentless suffocation" mentioned in the quote can be seen as a metaphor for the existential struggle to maintain one's individuality and autonomy in a world that often seeks to subsume the individual into collective identities or ideologies.

Additionally, the quote's emphasis on displacement and the loss of home resonates with the philosophical concept of "unheimlich" or the uncanny, as explored by thinkers like Sigmund Freud and Martin Heidegger. The uncanny refers to the feeling of estrangement or alienation that arises when something familiar becomes unfamiliar, when the sense of home is disrupted. In the context of Aberjhani's quote, the displacement of thousands of people from their homelands can be seen as a profound instance of the uncanny, where the familiar sense of belonging is replaced by the unsettling experience of being uprooted and cast adrift.

A Reflection of Spiritual Values

The author’s work can also be aligned with spiritual traditions that emphasize compassion, empathy, and the interconnectedness of all beings. The quote's reference to the "singular breath which makes human beings individuals" echoes spiritual teachings on the sanctity of life and the importance of recognizing the humanity of others. In this sense, Aberjhani's words can be seen as a call to empathy and a reminder of the moral responsibility to care for those who are suffering, regardless of their nationality, ethnicity, or political affiliation.

Buddhist philosophy, for example, teaches that all beings are interconnected and that suffering in one part of the world affects the whole. The Buddhist concept of "karuna" or compassion involves recognizing the suffering of others and taking action to alleviate it. Similarly, the Christian tradition emphasizes the importance of loving one's neighbor and caring for the marginalized and oppressed. Aberjhani's quote, with its emphasis on the brutalities of war and the displacement of individuals, can be seen as a reflection of these spiritual values, calling on readers to respond with compassion and empathy to the suffering of others.

The Intersection of Poetic Language and Political Persuasion

Use of the quote by opposing sides in the Middle Eastern conflict illustrates the complex relationship between poetic language and political persuasion. It may on one hand be adapted to different political narratives, providing rhetorical support for diverse positions. On the other hand, the transcendent nature of the language suggests a deeper truth that goes beyond the specifics of any one conflict—a truth about the shared human experience of suffering, displacement, and the struggle for individuality.

This dual function of poetic language—as both a tool for political persuasion and a vehicle for expressing universal truths—has long been recognized by philosophers and literary theorists. Aristotle, in his Poetics, argued that poetry is capable of expressing universal truths in a way that is more powerful and memorable than prose. Similarly, the 20th-century philosopher Paul Ricoeur explored how metaphorical language allows for the expression of complex and layered meanings, enabling poetry to reveal truths that are not easily captured by literal language.

In the context of Aberjhani's work, the use of poetic language allows for a nuanced exploration of the human condition, one that resonates with readers on an emotional as well as an intellectual level. The adaptability of his words to different political contexts reflects the power of poetry to speak to universal experiences, while the deeper moral and philosophical implications of his work suggest a commitment to social justice and human rights that transcends partisan politics.

Conclusion: Enduring Influence

The widespread citation of various writings by Aberjhani, by individuals with conflicting political views, underscores his impact as an influential 21st-century thinker and writer. His ability to articulate the complexities of the human condition in a way that resonates across ideological divides is a testament to the power of his work and the universality of his themes. By drawing on the rich tradition of poetic language, his work offer a nuanced perspective on issues of conflict, displacement, and the struggle for individuality—one that transcends the specifics of any one political debate and speaks to the broader human experience.

The intersection of author-artist-documentarian's work with various philosophical and spiritual traditions highlights the depth and complexity of his thought. Ultimately, through the quote examined in this essay, he invites readers to consider the intrinsic value of human life and the ethical imperative to resist forces that seek to dehumanize or oppress. Whether viewed through the lens of existentialism, personalism, or spiritual traditions, his words challenge us to think about the deeper moral and philosophical implications of our political choices and actions. In doing so, they remind us that the true power of poetic utterance lies not in its ability to dictate specific ideologies or policies but in its capacity to inspire a more compassionate and just engagement with the world.

By ChatGPT Op-Ed Contributor 4114
With Bright Skylark Literary Productions
Special to AI Literary Chat Salon 2024

DISCOVER WHAT ALL THE TALK IS ABOUT INSIDE THE AI LITERARY CHAT SALON

• Versatility and Vision in the Writings of Rotimi Ogunjobi
• Cultural Consciousness in Aime Cesaire’s Return to My Native Land and Aberjhani’s Return to Savannah
• Introducing the AI Literary Chat Salon
• Chatbot Op-ed 222: The Significance of ‘Songs from the Black Skylark zPed Music Player’ in the Face of Contemporary Challenges
• These Black and Blue Red Zone Days in the Post-Pandemic Era
• War-time Powers and Persuasions of Poetry
• Inside the AI Literary Chat Salon: Literary Luminary Rosemary Daniell 
• AI Flips the Interview Script with 7 Questions for 1 Author
• AI Flips the Interview Script with 5 More Questions for 1 Author
• Observing 20th Anniversary of Encyclopedia of the Harlem Renaissance
• Chat Op-ed 444: Celebrating ‘The Wisdom of W.E.B. Du Bois’: A Testament to Enduring Relevance 
• Stanley J. White as Viewed through a Lens of Creative Evolution
• How 3 Poems Help Illuminate the Presidential Legacy of Barack H. Obama
• ‘Haiku-Elegy for a Queen’: Exploring 1 Poem’s Potential Value in 3 Contexts